Commons:Valued image candidates

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations

Skip to most valued reviews

Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques. Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria. A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope. The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules. An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR. If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Valued Image links: Main VI page Valued image candidates Valued image criteria Valued image scope Valued image value Nomination procedure Review procedure Most Valued Review Promotion rules Valued image closure How to nominate an image for VI status Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review. Adding a new nomination (image) Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button. Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage. Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section: |My-image-filename.jpg so that it looks like this: {{VICs ... |My-image-filename.jpg }} and save the candidate list. Renomination Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review. Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination. Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination. Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in |date={{subst:VI-time}} Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review). Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with |nominator=~~~ Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure. Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}") replace the review parameter with |review= {{subst:VIC-archive}} }} Save the page. There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews. Save the previous reviews archive page Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list. How to open a Most Valued Review There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: === Scope === {{VICs |candidate1.jpg |candidate2.jpg }} where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR. The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing. How to review the candidates How to review an image Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it). Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion. Review procedure On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters. Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six. Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination. Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries. If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued. If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR. Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows: You type You get When *{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~  Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment. *{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~  Info My information. -- Example You have information. *{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote. *{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria. *{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~  Question My question. -- Example You have a question. *{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria. If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template. Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page. How to update the status Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate: status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border). status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border). status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border). status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border). Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized. Changes in scope during the review period The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

53,856 closed valued image candidates
Closed as				Nominations
Promoted			48,383 (89.8%)
Undecided			3,001 (5.6%)
Declined			2,472 (4.6%)

New valued image nominations

Review it! (edit) Nominated by: MasterRus21thCentury (talk) on 2024-01-11 20:43 (UTC) Scope: ... Reason: 30 лет назад, 11 января 1994 года, состоялось открытие современного российского парламента - Федерального Собрания, состоящего из Государственной Думы и Совета Федерации. -- MasterRus21thCentury (talk) Open for review.	View promotion Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2024-01-12 09:34 (UTC) Scope: Anthus berthelotii (museum specimens) (Berthelot's pipit) eggs  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 13:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-01-12 13:56 (UTC) Scope: Aiways U6 - left rear view Used in: en:Aiways U6, fr:Aiways U6, it:Aiways U6, pl:Aiways U6  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-12 16:51 (UTC) Scope: Anhinga novaehollandiae (Australasian darter) male Open for review.
View promotion Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-12 16:54 (UTC) Scope: Anhinga novaehollandiae (Australasian darter) male eating fish  Support Useful & used. Note: there are many images of this bird. The fish in the mouth was the deciding factor for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)  Comment Yes, very many; the scope was for the bird eating, but I didn't specify the fish which thankfully the tour company identified for me later. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-01-12 17:40 (UTC) Scope: Clouds over Scuol. Not a valid scope for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Question: What do you think is a valid scope?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC) A named mountain clearly visible with orientation noted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
View promotion Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-01-13 06:03 (UTC) Scope: Pseudamussium peslutrae (Seven Rayed Scallop) right valve  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-01-13 06:03 (UTC) Scope: Pseudamussium peslutrae (Seven Rayed Scallop) left valve  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-13 06:31 (UTC) Scope: Male portrait inspired by Antonine era models (inv.281) - Museo Archeologico Nazionale  Support This version of the bust is the clearest in the selected category. Therefore, the photo is useful and the scope is suitable. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-13 06:33 (UTC) Scope: Mujeres - Francisco Iturrino - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 07:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-13 06:38 (UTC) Scope: Votive stupa, 19th century Mongolia - Musée Georges Labit, Toulouse  Support useful. should be stupa Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Absolutely, thank you...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2024-01-13 07:44 (UTC) Scope: Anthus berthelotii (museum specimens) (Berthelot's pipit (madeirensis))  Support useful. It's the day of the pipits. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) on 2024-01-13 12:07 (UTC) Scope: Jacques Delors, 1993, portrait photography Used in: Jacques Delors Reason: Best-quality image of M. Delors on the Commons. -- ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) I prefer the uncropped version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-13 15:44 (UTC) Scope: Anthus australis bistriatus (Australian pipit)  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) on 2024-01-13 19:41 (UTC) Scope: Karapur Miah Bari Mosque Used in: bn:কড়াপুর মিয়াবাড়ি মসজিদ, en:Miah Bari Mosque, d:Q25587967 Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-14 06:03 (UTC) Scope: Cabinet with view of Candia at the time of the Venetian-Turkish war in Museo Correr Maker is Morosi? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC) The doge Francesco Morosini was the owner of this piece of furniture. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-14 06:04 (UTC) Scope: Aglia tau f. melaina – mounted specimen female ventral  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-14 06:06 (UTC) Scope: Ritual cauldron for food offerings, ding - China 475-221 BC J.C. - Musée Georges Labit Toulouse Scope should indicate country/estimated date. I guess this is from China (Chine) Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)  Done useful details, thank you --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 03:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-01-14 06:18 (UTC) Scope: Favartia rosamiae, shell  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: kaʁstn on 2024-01-14 12:57 (UTC) Scope: Building “Koloniestraße 72” in Duisburg, headquarters of Staatsanwaltschaft Duisburg (public prosecutor's office) Used in: de:Staatsanwaltschaft Duisburg, de:Liste der Staatsanwaltschaften in Nordrhein-Westfalen, d:Q59721973, d:Q106406660  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: kaʁstn on 2024-01-14 13:09 (UTC) Scope: Museo de Antioquia, Medellín (east facade with main entrance) Used in: de:Museo de Antioquia, d:Q2377645, …  Support Useful and used file that meets the defined scope criteria. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: kaʁstn on 2024-01-14 13:22 (UTC) Scope: Statue of Christ by Hans Schwegerle (1908) at St. Lorenz, Lübeck Used in: d:Q124285959, de:Hans Schwegerle, de:Skulpturen und Objekte in Lübeck#„Christus“  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2024-01-14 13:40 (UTC) Scope: Anthus similis (museum specimens) (long-billed pipit (captus)) eggs  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-01-14 14:23 (UTC) Scope: BMW G60 550e - right rear view  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Radomianin (talk) on 2024-01-14 16:20 (UTC) Scope: Fishermen's Church in Born a. Darß Used in: de:Fischerkirche Born a. Darß • en:Born auf dem Darß Reason: The listed wooden church with its thatched roof is in harmony with the unspoiled landscape of the Western Pomeranian Lagoon Area National Park and the traditional architecture of the village. The church was built in the winter of 1934/35 and consecrated on March 31, 1935. It was designed by the architects Bernhard Hopp and Rudolf Jäger from Hamburg. This image successfully took part in the 2023 Wiki Loves Monuments competition in Germany and achieved the 74th place. -- Radomianin (talk)  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-15 06:05 (UTC) Scope: Portrait de Napoléon en tenue de colonel de la Garde Nationale by Henri Félix Emmanuel Philippoteaux - Museo Correr Venice  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 10:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-15 06:07 (UTC) Scope: Danseur dit à l'écharpe Royaume de Champa (Vietnam), Musée Georges Labit Toulouse  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) red link in category hierarchy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC) I suspect Danseur à l'écharpe is a good scope. Is it a scarf dance? It's not her who's the scarf, is it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) The wording shows that the title is assumed by the museum but it is not official --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Their mistake. We shouldn't promulgate it. The scarf dance is a big thing in Vietnam. Can you change it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-15 06:08 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Zeus - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-01-15 06:27 (UTC) Scope: Mancinella armigera (Belligerent Rock Snail), shell, juvenile  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-01-15 10:51 (UTC) Scope: Cupra Formentor VZ5 BAT - right front view  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-15 15:33 (UTC) Scope: Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus (Australian fur seal) male all images reviewed and moved to ssp category Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-15 15:46 (UTC) Scope: Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus (Australian fur seal) female Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-01-15 16:37 (UTC) Scope: Mariakerk (Wierum) (Main entrance.)  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-15 16:41 (UTC) Scope: Arctocephalus forsteri (New Zealand fur seal) female with suckling pup  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-16 06:05 (UTC) Scope: Portrait of Lucius Cornelius Sulla - Museo Archeologico Nazionale  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-16 06:06 (UTC) Scope: Bruguières, France - war memorial  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-16 06:08 (UTC) Scope: Les meves cosines (my cousins) - Ignacio Zuloaga - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya Again, a translation of the Catalan would be useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-15 16:24 (UTC) Scope: Arctocephalus forsteri (New Zealand fur seal) male Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-15 18:04 (UTC) Scope: Macropus fuliginosus fuliginosus (Kangaroo Island Western grey kangaroo) male Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-01-15 18:06 (UTC) Scope: Macropus fuliginosus fuliginosus (Kangaroo Island Western grey kangaroo) female with joey  Support Useful & used. I think the photo is one of the best in the category.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) All Kangaroo Island images moved to ssp. category Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-01-16 16:58 (UTC) Scope: Reformierte Kirche Vnà Southeast side.  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-01-16 19:47 (UTC) Scope: Chapelle Notre Dame des Champs (Templemars), view from Chem. de la Chapelle Used in: Templemars  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Draceane talkcontrib. on 2024-01-16 20:45 (UTC) Scope: Augustin Heřman, print portrait  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-17 06:03 (UTC) Scope: Insegna dell'arte dei Giupponeri (sarti da uomo) - Correr Museum Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-17 06:06 (UTC) Scope: Mare de Déu 66057 - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-17 06:06 (UTC) Scope: Teatro La Fenice (Venice) – Left Mascaron of the facade. Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-01-16 20:41 (UTC) Scope: Category:Hank Williams Used in: en:Hank Williams etc. Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-01-16 20:38 (UTC) Scope: Category:Giordano-Bruno-Stiftung Used in: en:Giordano Bruno Foundation, de:Giordano-Bruno-Stiftung Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-01-16 20:31 (UTC) Scope: Ilkka Niiniluoto Used in: en:Ilkka Niiniluoto (es, fi, ru, sv), en:History of philosophy in Finland Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-01-16 20:25 (UTC) Scope: Ibtissame Betty Lachgar Used in: en:Ibtissam Lachgar (de-wiki, es-wiki, fr-wiki etc.) Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates

agouti

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2019-08-05 09:38 (UTC) Scope: Dasyprocta punctata (Central American agouti)  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2023-03-24 15:31 (UTC) Scope: Dasyprocta punctata (Central American agouti)  Comment We already have a VI in this scope and I see at list one more image of comparable quality, and both are used. Should we start MVR for this scope?  Comment Yes it is better to go through MVR. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)  Best in Scope now and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)  Best in Scope now. --Tupungato (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC) Scope: Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico) (Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico)) Previous reviews  Comment Good image, good caption, but the scope is too imprecise (it can be improved) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done the scope has changed--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC) Scope: Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México (Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City) Reason: The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)  Comment There is already an image promoted in VI: you have to go to Pending Most valued review candidates --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC) Scope: El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach  Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC) Scope: El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach  Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC) Scope: Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC) Scope: Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.