Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2024.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2024.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 17 2024 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 07:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day.

January 17, 2024

• 
  • Nomination . By User:Mike Peel --XRay 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ferocactus hamatacanthus at Jardin de Cactus in 2022. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Wicker sculpture of a badger at Stourhead. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Stanley John ("Bertie") Reed, sailor. Bust by Cape Town sculptor Charl Frank at the V&A Waterfront. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Casa Fuerte de Adeje.Ich, der Urheber dieses Werkes, veröffentliche es unter der folgenden Lizenz:. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ISU-152M, Volgograd Panorama Museum --Mike1979 Russia 06:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: BM-13NMM rocket launcher, Volgograd Panorama Museum --Mike1979 Russia 06:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 5 cm Pak-38 anti-tank gun. Volgograd Panorama Museum --Mike1979 Russia 06:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Skate-class submarine profile --Mike1979 Russia 06:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: USS Seawolf (SSN-575) submarine profile --Mike1979 Russia 06:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sheep in Weißenohe --Plozessor 05:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: "New lake" in "Old and new lake bird reserve" nature reserve north of Gerolzhofen --Plozessor 05:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
    The clear stitching seam should be reworked. --Ermell
    @Ermell: Oops! How did I overlook that! Thx for spotting, fixed it as good as I could now. --Plozessor 07:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC) 06:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Laudenbach" stream above Trusesal waterfall (the railing is slightly crooked) --Plozessor 05:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow in "In the Kies and lower Unkenbach" protected landscape area --Plozessor 05:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Zellergrund" ground with "Zellergrundbach" stream and cattle north of Zell north of Schweinfurt --Plozessor 05:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. View from the Steinsberg plateau of the surrounding mountains.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church tower of the Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Broken larch above Zuort.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 2-4 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Welfenschloss in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sydekumstr. 13-15 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Giles church in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential house on 10. Oktober Straße #57, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment building on Auf der Werzer Leitn #4 and #6, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former post office “9210” on Hauptstraße #151, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartments Werzer on Annastraße #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West wall of apartments Werzer on Annastraße #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
• 
  • Nomination: Dirt road in Rubim - Brasil --Túllio F 01:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs perspective correction, otherwise good --Plozessor 05:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Presa del Embalse de Santa Ana --Túllio F 01:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slightly tilted. Otherwise acceptable (given that it's from 2013). --Plozessor 05:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marcus Aurelius sestertius circa 152 --Siren-Com 01:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan. The petroglyph depicts an ibex. --Bgag 00:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Minaret of Sher-Dor Madrasa, Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail on the portal of Sher-Dor Madrasa in Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dome and minaret of Sher-Dor Madrasa in Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sher-Dor Madrasa in Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

January 16, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Brewer's bishop's cap (Mitella breweri) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diesel locomotive 245 037 of DB Regio --JoachimKohler-HB 23:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 generations of electric locomotives: SBB Cargo Re 482 027 and SBB Cargo Re 421 384 at the SBB workshop in Bellinzona (Ticino). --JoachimKohler-HB 23:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Stellingen, Hagenbeckallee 10 --KaiBorgeest 22:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sežana Botanical Garden --TadejM 22:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Husky at Goristaya street. Borovoy, Kalevalsky District, Republic of Karelia, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 22:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, this is lacking detail (it has remains of massive NR by the smartphone). --Plozessor 05:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Husky at Goristaya street. Borovoy, Kalevalsky District, Republic of Karelia, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 22:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This could probably be acceptable but it's too dark. --Plozessor 05:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Residential house at 73, Yalguba village. Prionezhsky District, Republic of Karelia, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 22:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Common Vole near Nigishlamba Lake. Prionezhsky District, Republic of Karelia, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 22:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination SBB Tm 234 435 construction train in Kreuzlingen --JoachimKohler-HB 22:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination False Creek from Granville Street Bridge, Vancouver, BC. Stitched panorama. --Jmabel 22:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Thi 23:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Turkey vulture, Bandon, Oregon --Jmabel 22:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Túllio F 01:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Copper(II) acetate anhydrous --Keresluna 21:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of Tsikalia, Mani. --C messier 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ruined houses in Tsikalia, Mani. --C messier 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The hamlet of Zoufa, Mani. --C messier 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Street in Kita, Mani. --C messier 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The byzantine church of Saints Sergius and Bacchus near Kitta, Mani. --C messier 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 22:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Túllio F 01:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: hydrobiologist collecting zoobenthos --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A Hindu pooja ceremony at the Besakih Temple, Bali --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Portrait of Epicurus, British Museum --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: One of the common symbols of atheism, created in 2007 --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Atomic whirl, used as a symbol of atheism from the 1960s --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Red squirrel in the branches of a trimmed elderberry bush, Heilbronn, Germany. —Aristeas 20:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colourful image of a hand on a playground gate in Heilbronn, Germany. —Aristeas 20:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winter scene in the cemetery of Böckingen, Heilbronn, Germany. —Aristeas 20:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Willy Brandt avenue in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. That this track was named “Willy-Brandt-Allee” seems to indicate that Bavarian authorities did not like Willy Brandt ;–). --Aristeas 20:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Corer for plums, damsons, cherries and the like. --Berthold Werner 16:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Corer for plums, damsons, cherries and the like. --Berthold Werner 16:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mitsubishi Colt (2023) in Leinfelden-Echterdingen --Alexander-93 16:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review A too tight crop for my taste. Do you have a broader version? --PantheraLeo1359531 17:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Renault Koleos II in Leinfelden-Echterdingen --Alexander-93 16:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Battle of the Bulge monument in the Luxembourg. --Cayambe 15:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Another aerial view of parc de Merl in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 15:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of parc de Merl in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 15:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality (taking into account that this is a drone photo). --Aristeas 20:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: T-34-85 tank at the Mother Armenia Museum. Yerevan, Armenia. --Argenberg 13:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panoramic view of Yerevan (southeast). Yerevan, Armenia. --Argenberg 13:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Main facade of Matenadaran Mesrop Mashtots Museum. Yerevan, Armenia. --Argenberg 13:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Moscow's Red Square on holiday. Moscow, Russia. --Argenberg 13:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Australasian darter (Anhinga novaehollandiae) young male --Charlesjsharp 11:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australasian swamphen (Porphyrio melanotus) --Charlesjsharp 11:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australasian swamphen (Porphyrio melanotus) --Charlesjsharp 11:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 19:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australian brushturkey (Alectura lathami) female --Charlesjsharp 11:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 19:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Australian brushturkey (Alectura lathami) female --Charlesjsharp 11:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mini Countryman (U25) John Cooper Works in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 10:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination BMW G87 M2 in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 10:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Thi 11:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nissan Townstar in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 10:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pavé Stratégique roundabout, in Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 10:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Restaurant Americana, Rue du Fort, in Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 10:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz G 63 AMG by Hensoldt Group at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 08:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Amazone FT-P 1502 autonomous front tank mounted to a Fendt Helios tractor at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 08:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Barilla Professional booth at WTCE 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 08:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Independence Arch in Greater Accra --MB-one 08:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Grandezza 28 OC at Interboot 2020 --MB-one 08:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 15:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Málaga Cathedral, Spain --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Albentosa, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit noisy, otherwise good --MB-one 08:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Denoised --Poco a poco 20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Convent of Santa Clara, Trujillo, Cáceres, Spain --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Castle of Sibirana, Uncastillo, Zaragoza, Spai --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Sibirana, Uncastillo, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roy Lichtenstein: The Face of Barcelona --Mike Peel 07:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Artichoke at Dunham Massey Hall gardens --Mike Peel 07:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Singapore Gujarati School --Mike Peel 07:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Banco Sonoro Jorge Wilheim --Mike Peel 07:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Banco Sonoro Jorge Wilheim --Mike Peel 07:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quality is fine but it looks tilted in cw direction. It probably needs a tilt and perspective correction --Poco a poco 07:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose This one lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 07:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Children's author Peter Lerangis - Jmabel 06:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The late novelist and travel writer Jonathan Raban - Jmabel 06:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Musician Mike Hadreas, better known as Perfume Genius. --Jmabel 06:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Fondamente Nove in Venedig --Ermell 06:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to the north from the Fondamente Nove in Venice. --Ermell 06:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, nice scene. --Aristeas 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to the north from the Fondamente Nove in Venice --Ermell 06:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to the north from the Fondamente Nove in Venice --Ermell 06:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fondamenta Cavanella in Burano (Italien). --Ermell 06:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tail of storm Gerrit over the Langweerderwielen.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. Part of the castle ruins on the Steinsberg plateau.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 13:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. View from the Steinsberg plateau of the surrounding mountains.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Plaza and stage outside of Los Olivos Church, Adeje. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Isn't the stage both blurry and noisy? --Plozessor 05:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Plozessor: Tweaked with both noise and sharpness, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Artificial flower arches at Dunham Massey Hall gardens. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Euphorbia aphylla at Parque del Drago, Tenerife. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality for me, but narrow cut.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: New York Transit Museum annex in Grand Central Terminal. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Clock Tower Lodge at Stourhead, Wiltshire. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lower part of natural monument / geotope "Muschelkalk quarry southwest of Krautheim" --Plozessor 05:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Nut hole", part of "Grinding meadows and nut hole near Lindach" nature reserve --Plozessor 05:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 15:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination North part of "Üchtelhäuser Grund" protected landscape area --Plozessor 05:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Timber-framed farmhouse in Wernsdorf --Plozessor 05:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Timber-framed farmhouse in Ehrl --Plozessor 05:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lange Straße 51 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lange Straße 55 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. I'd reduce blue a bit but that is probably a matter of taste. --Plozessor 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lange Straße 57 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lange Straße 63 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lange Straße 100 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartments Werzer on Annastraße #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window shutters at the west wall of apartments Werzer on Annastraße #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hotel Sonnengrund in der Annastraße #9, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Villa on Wahlißstraße #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bed and breakfast inn on Wahlißstraße #7, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Traditional Iftar in Old Dhaka. --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please mention the creator in nomination (this is from Shariful Islam (Masum). --Plozessor 05:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Details of terracotta panels at Pancha Ratna Govinda Temple . By User:অভিজিৎ দাস --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Lalbagh Qilla, Dhaka. By User:Azimronnie --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Details of terracotta panels at Kantanagar Temple. By User:Shahinul06 --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, this is tilted and blurred. --Plozessor 05:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Construction of Padma Bridge (2019). By User:Azimronnie --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Steles in Burana Tower site, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ak-Buura River in Osh, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Registan in Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan. The petroglyph depicts an ibex hunt with a snow leopard. --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boat on Geum River during Baekje Cultural Festival in Gongju, South Korea --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, beautiful. Could add a CAT:Reflections in South Korea. --Tagooty 03:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Magalia Community Church in Butte County, California --Frank Schulenburg 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eurasian spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) in breeding plumage showing top of bill, Ranganathittu Bird Sanctuary --Tagooty 00:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eurasian spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) in breeding plumage walking, Ranganathittu Bird Sanctuary, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 00:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Spot-billed pelican chicks in nest (Pelecanus philippensis), Ranganathittu Bird Sanctuary --Tagooty 00:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Why so dark? Brightest spot is at 71 %. --Plozessor 05:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spot-billed pelican (Pelecanus philippensis) in flight, Ranganathittu Bird Sanctuary --Tagooty 00:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spot-billed pelicans (Pelecanus philippensis) in nest with chicks, Ranganathittu Bird Sanctuary --Tagooty 00:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 15, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Dracocephalum ruyschiana --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alpine honeysuckle (Lonicera alpigena) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Paseo Jesús de Galíndez, January 2024, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is tilted. --Plozessor 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
    done, thanks --Ezarate 13:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Papaver rhoeas. Capsule and stamens --Ввласенко 21:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
    I don't how to evaluate this kind of pictures, but are you sure anything is in focus there? --Ezarate 23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Only pistil is in focus but still overall quality is not enough, sorry. --Plozessor 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terraces near Tsikalia, Mani. --C messier 20:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, very typical view for that landscape --Aristeas 20:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Sychalasmata, Mani. --C messier 20:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower house in Tsikalia, Mani. --C messier 20:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. You may try to clone out the rope on the wall. Same is ok --Ezarate 23:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone houses in Kitta, Mani. --C messier 20:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The byzantine church of Saints Sergius and Bacchus near Kitta, Mani. --C messier 20:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maserati Type 250F at Paris Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of City Bowl, Cape Town seen from Table Mountain --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Stanced Jaguar XJ40 at Essen Motor Show 2023 --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ganz Ovation 7.6 at Interboot 2023 in Friedrichshafen, Germany --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Atta Mills Presidential Library in Cape Coast --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Le restaurant de Sorebois et l'arrêt intermédiaire du télécabine Zinal-Sorebois. --Espandero 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Le val d'Anniviers vu depuis Sorebois. --Espandero 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination L'Espace Weisshorn à Sorebois. --Espandero 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Thi 11:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: La pointe de Tsevalire et les becs de Bosson vus depuis la corne de Sorebois. --Espandero 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Les aiguilles Rouges d'Arolla vues depuis la corne de Sorebois. --Espandero 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave in the Bellu Cemetery, unknown owner --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Constantin Tănase in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Grave of Constantin Tănase in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Constantin Tănase in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination First aid kit for motor vehicles from the1950s --Berthold Werner 16:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
    Good photo, but looks like there are some filaments or threads or hairs at the side / in the background. Any chance to retouch these? --Plozessor 05:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Berthold Werner 16:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination First aid kit for motor vehicles from the1950s --Berthold Werner 16:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, but also is has some filaments or so in the background. --Plozessor 05:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Berthold Werner 16:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
• 
  • Nomination: First aid kit for motor vehicles from the1950s --Berthold Werner 16:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 2011 Volkswagen Polo S 60 1.2 Front Taken in Leamington Spa --Davekern 16:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alpine A110 profil --Kakoula10 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination GasGas EC250f 2024 --Kakoula10 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unfortunately a bit too tightly cropped to look good. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite blurry unfortunately. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination TUM Hyperloop at IAA 2023 --Alexander-93 16:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ford Explorer EV at IAA 2023 --Alexander-93 16:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Saint Martin church in Warsaw, Poland. --Kadellar 15:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mirador Building, Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 15:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Victory arch, Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 15:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Victory arch, Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 15:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Victory arch, Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 15:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Taopiphop Limjittrakorn at parliament house for children's day 2024 --KrebsLovesFiesh 12:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Snow on trees, Séveraissette valley. --Yann 12:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Snow on trees, Séveraissette valley. --Yann 12:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Beautiful composition but unfortunately lack of DOF (nothing is really in focus) --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Light on trees with snow, Séveraissette valley. --Yann 11:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry but there's nothing really sharp here. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mitsubishi ASX (2nd generation) in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 10:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 12:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mitsubishi Colt (2023) in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 10:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination BMW 218i Active Tourer in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 10:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australasian darter (Anhinga novaehollandiae) male --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australasian darter (Anhinga novaehollandiae) female --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australasian darter (Anhinga novaehollandiae) male --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australasian darter (Anhinga novaehollandiae) male --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice set --George Chernilevsky 13:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Australasian darter (Anhinga novaehollandiae) male --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice set --George Chernilevsky 13:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wat Sa Si, Sukhothai Historical Park, Thailand --BigDom 10:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to the north from the Fondamente Nove in Venice --Ermell 09:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Yann 12:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former indoor swimming pool Bamberg --Ermell 09:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Exit 18 Breitengüßbach Nord to the federal motorway 73 in Breitengüßbach --Ermell 09:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Is the highway really so blue? Looks tinted. --Plozessor 05:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
    Have a look at the new version. --Ermell 22:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front view of the OM System 90 mm F3.5 ED Macro IS Pro --Ermell 09:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --BigDom 10:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vegetable seller's boat at dei Vetrai in Murano --Ermell 09:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Senotín train station --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Also has some chromatic aberration but IMO it's still acceptable. --Plozessor 05:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
    corrected --Draceane 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of Litoměřice --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite prominent red and green CAs and needs perspective correction. --C messier 14:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
    corrected --Draceane 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of Kraľova hoľa from Červená skala, Trsteník --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Jablonov highway bridge --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Veľká lúka ("The Great Meadow"), Muránska planina --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Listed timber-framed buildings Stuttgarter Strasse no. 2 (left) und Marktplatz no. 4 (right) in Herrenberg, Germany. —Aristeas 08:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Schloss Urach over the river Erms in Bad Urach, Germany. —Aristeas 08:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Listed half-timbered house Schlachthausgasse no. 2 (1748) in Bretten, Germany. NB: The roof is crooked in reality. —Aristeas 08:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cretan ebony (Ebenus cretica) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Allium strictum --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lasar Segall: Emigrantes --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lasar Segall: Emigrantes --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good picture, filename could be more specific. --Plozessor 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Daisy Nasser: Nascer --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good picture, filename could be more specific. --Plozessor 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Daisy Nasser: Nascer --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Daisy Nasser: Nascer --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View of the Lys, at Warneton, France --Velvet 07:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winter in Zell - trees at the bottom of the Wehnerwiese seen from Zeller Straße --Kritzolina 07:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cemetery in Zell, Schäftlarn - Cross looking over the newest part of the cemetery --Kritzolina 07:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farmhouse called Marxnhof or Beim Angermüller on Neufahrnerstraße in Zell, Schäftlarn seen from the Zell cemetery --Kritzolina 07:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Michael in Zell in winter with hall of blessing seen from the cemetery --Kritzolina 07:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Michael in Zell in winter with hall of blessing seen from the cemetery --Kritzolina 07:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carved pumpkin, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Llez 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carved pumpkin, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Llez 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carved pumpkin, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Llez 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lagenaria siceraria "Indian Mix", pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --Llez 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain in the south garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --Llez 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    This is tilted ccw. --Plozessor 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 07:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Probably 15th century farmhouse in Hallstadt --Plozessor 05:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old house at Königsberg salt market --Plozessor 05:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Townhall of Ibind --Plozessor 05:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giant hogweed at "biodiversity trail" near Rauhenebrach --Plozessor 05:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Is it possible to reduce the highlights a bit? --Llez 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Llez: Better?
    OK, good quality --Llez 07:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC) --Plozessor 06:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Information board at "Reed sandstone quarry northeast of Zeil am Main" geotope --Plozessor 05:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rhododendron at Biddulph Grange Garden. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Artichoke at Dunham Massey Hall gardens. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination At Fuerteventura 2022. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good picture, filename should be more specific --Plozessor 06:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination . By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Background is slightly leaning out but that is IMO not an issue as the subject is the tree. --Plozessor 06:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferocactus hamatacanthus at Jardin de Cactus in 2022. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tail of storm Gerrit over the Langweerderwielen.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House in the center of Ardez, Bröl dadaint 18. (Detail)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. Part of the castle ruins on the Steinsberg plateau.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kirchplatz 7 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Burgstraße 7 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Burgstraße 11 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Burgstraße 12 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Burgstraße 13 in Hann. Münden, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lotus Pond and Manharu Pavillion in Gongsanseong Fortress, Gongju, South Korea --Bgag 04:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Juhamnu Pavilion in Huwon Garden, Seoul --Bgag 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Highlights a little bit bright. --XRay 05:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buyongjeong Pavilion in Huwon Garden, Seoul --Bgag 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    A bit overexposed? --Tagooty 04:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Bgag 14:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aeryeonji Pond and Aeryeonjeong Pavilion in Huwon Garden, Seoul --Bgag 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tomb guardian (also called jinmyoso or seoksu) found in the tomb of King Muryiong, Gongju National Museum, South Korea. --Bgag 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tic Tac 1 --Jacek Halicki 03:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tic Tac 2 --Jacek Halicki 03:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tic Tac 3 --Jacek Halicki 03:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rose garden and palm house of Mainau Island, Lake Constance. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Fishing boats resting in Greetsiel (East Frisia) --JoachimKohler-HB 01:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but this is quite blurry, and the white ship is blown out. --Plozessor 06:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial photographs of Narapatir Dhap, Cumilla. By User:Azimronnie --আফতাবুজ্জামান 00:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Mahangar Natya Mancha, Dhaka. By User:Fxxabir --আফতাবুজ্জামান 00:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Construction of Padma Bridge (2019). By User:Azimronnie --আফতাবুজ্জামান 00:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 14, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Varese beach on January 2024, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach of stone between Varese beach and Grande beach, January 2024, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 20:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Beach in Stegna. Rhodes, Greece --Ввласенко 21:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination La Moneda Palace, Santiago de Chile --Draceane 19:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Torres del Paine National Park --Draceane 19:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Valdivia from the Pedro de Valdivia Bridge --Draceane 19:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bagpipers of Strakonice, final parade of the 23th International Bagpipe Festival, Strakonice --Draceane 19:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: MAN TGS 18.510 AgroTruck with Schwarte Jansky manure trailer at Agritechnica 2023 by User:MarcelX42 --MB-one 16:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some perspective correction is needed. --Mike Peel 23:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forester kangaroo (Macropus giganteus tasmaniensis) juvenile --Charlesjsharp 14:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but not enough of the kangaroo is in focus --Mike Peel 23:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
    Please have another look --Charlesjsharp 10:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, but looking again, it's a bit improved but the front and back are still really out of focus, particularly on the front which has turned into a blue haze. More dof was needed here, sorry. --Mike Peel 22:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Banc du Peyron depuis la Motte-en-Champsaur. --Yann 14:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too soft. --Draceane 20:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: War memorial of La Motte-en-Champsaur, Hautes-Alpes. --Yann 14:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Not very sharp, and slightly rotated ccw. --Plozessor 14:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street in Flomochori. --C messier 13:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terraces near Tsikalia, Mani. --C messier 13:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality – nice pattern. --Aristeas 08:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Flomochori, Mani. --C messier 13:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, good light which emphasizes the towers. --Aristeas 08:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parque de las Luces with hundreds of light poles in Medellín, Colombia. --Carschten 11:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail view of the light poles at Parque de las Luces in Medellín, Colombia. --Carschten 11:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Portugal, Coimbra, Cloister of Mosteiro Santa Cruz --Berthold Werner 10:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Luís Morrone: Firmiano Pinto --Mike Peel 08:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 20:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 13, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Audi A4 in Playa Grande, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Looks like you sharpened a lot of noise. Maybe apply a stronger mask before sharpening --MB-one 16:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
    done, also resaved at 100% --Ezarate 22:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now --MB-one 20:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Varese Beach in January 2024, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    color banding Unfortunately there's color banding in the sky, probably from too strong JPG compression. Can you convert it with higher quality? --Plozessor 05:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks, Plozessor, both pictures now saved at 100% --Ezarate 22:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Thx! Much better now! --Plozessor 08:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Varese beach in January 2024, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    That too has color banding in the sky. --Plozessor 05:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Alcazaba, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 17:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Contrast is off, can you crop the sky? --Mike Peel 22:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Linderhof Palace (Schloss Linderhof) in Bavaria. --Cayambe 14:02, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    White areas are overexposed, not sure whether you can save it --Poco a poco 17:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Outono da Praça Paris --Mike Peel 12:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Monumento a Marechal Deodoro da Fonseca --Mike Peel 12:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Our Lady of Czestochowa church in Mostki, Lubusz Voivodeship, Poland. --Tournasol7 05:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This should IMO be a bit brightened, it uses only 83 % of the available brightness range. Yes, it was dark and snowing, but that doesn't mean that the picture must be dark. --Plozessor 05:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moyie Muborak Library Museum, Tashkent, Uzbekistan --Bgag 04:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 18:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 12, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Jatiyo Smriti Soudho, Savar. By User:Mfsam12 --আফতাবুজ্জামান 18:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 74 Strada Popa Tatu, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Railway switch in Zubrnice station --Draceane 13:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    lens + CA corrected --Draceane 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zubrnice station --Draceane 13:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is slightly rotated and not too sharp. --Plozessor 05:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
    corrected --Draceane 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Linaigrette dans le secteur de Champagny-en-Vanoise, été 2023, près du refuge de la Glière. By User:Ibex73 --Yann 12:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mariensäule in Zell in the snow in January 2024 --Kritzolina 11:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Seems a bit out of focus unfortunately --Plozessor 17:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave on the Zell cemetery --Kritzolina 11:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Schmihing Loader Master on a Zeppelin CAT 926 loader at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 11:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tugboat ZP Bison pulling Con-Ro carrier Atlantic Sun in the port of Hamburg --MB-one 11:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Valley of River Lozoya, Community of Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 10:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Homenaje a las lecheras (Medín Martín) --Mike Peel 07:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Homenaje a las lecheras (Medín Martín) --Mike Peel 07:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Casa Fuerte de Adeje.Ich, der Urheber dieses Werkes, veröffentliche es unter der folgenden Lizenz:. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Alcazaba, Málaga, Spain. By User:Poco a poco --XRay 05:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This has significant CA on the left side of the window, otherwise would be good. --Plozessor 05:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
     New version I've reduced it a bit, not so easy --Poco a poco 12:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
    Sorry, the CA removal itself might be ok, but now there are some weird-looking spots in the window, see the note I added. --Plozessor 08:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     New version (please, decide now whether it's good enough or not, I cannot improve it substantially) --Poco a poco 20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 11, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Old City Hall, Toronto --Another Believer 05:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Graffiti Alley, Toronto --Another Believer 05:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hamburg-Wilhelmsburg, Eversween, 'Getreide-Terminal Hamburg' (cereal terminal Hamburg) at Reiherstieg --KaiBorgeest 23:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    It looks like soft. More contrast? --XRay 05:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Etruscan antefix with head of Silen and anthemien nimbus, 4th century BC, from Cerveteri, Italy, ceramic, Antikensammlung TC 6681.2d, in the Neues Museum, Berlin --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 21:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The filename and description mention "head" which is not visible in this image. --Tagooty 03:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
    I did this because there are two images with the same object, one with the entire antefix, and another (this one) with a detail, so they will be easier to find in most of the categories in which they are both included--Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fragment of an Ionic capital, 175-150 BC, marble, from Pergamon, Turkey, Antikensammlung V4.2-143, in the Neues Museum, Berlin --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 21:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tsilivakos tower, Flomochori, Mani. --C messier 21:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you please remove the piece of building/tower at the left border? --Poco a poco 21:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wood speedwell (Veronica montana) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The flash light is too harsh. --Draceane 20:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forest in Torres del Paine National Park --Draceane 16:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Can you please remove the CA? --Poco a poco 21:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
     On hold Yes, I will do it by Sunday. --Draceane 08:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco I tried to suppress the CA. --~~~~
     Support Looks better --Poco a poco 07:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Augustinian monastery and garden in Vrchlabí, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 16:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Snow and ice on a pile created by clearing a sidewalk. You can see small stones mixed in that were distributed on the to prevent people from slipping on the icy surface of the sidewalk earlier. You can see footprints where people crossed the snow pile. --Kritzolina 16:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rail tracks at Bahnhof Ebenhausen-Schäftlarn --Kritzolina 16:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too dark and too blueish --Poco a poco 21:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rail tracks at Bahnhof Ebenhausen-Schäftlarn - looking along the tracks towards Icking --Kritzolina 16:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Vatluru Railway station, Eluru --IM3847 12:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View from the historic center to the high-rise buildings in Santa Fe, Bogotá, Colombia. --Carschten 10:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View from San Javier Station to the cable car (line J) of the Medellín Metro, Colombia. --Carschten 10:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Noccaea rotundifolia --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  I withdraw my nomination --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cockerel at Parque del Drago, Tenerife --Mike Peel 08:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The interior of Mariposario del Drago, Tenerife --Mike Peel 08:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Jameo Grande at Jameos del Agua --Mike Peel 08:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Sohail, Fuengirola, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 08:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I think there's some residual CA top-left in the wires, and right in the branches - can you tweak? Maybe also crop the branches on the right? --Mike Peel 10:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Sohail, Fuengirola, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 08:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Can you crop/clone out the branches at the top middle? Possibly could also do with a bit more sharpening. --Mike Peel 10:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality - much improved, thanks. --Mike Peel 22:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Gibralfaro, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 08:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Can you make it sharper? --Mike Peel 23:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 21:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. I was hoping for more sharpness, but this looks OK. --Mike Peel 22:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tomb of Pari Bibi. By User:Apu Jaman --আফতাবুজ্জামান 00:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Beautiful picture, but you need to reduce the chroma noise in raw conversion --Plozessor 05:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: MI09 unit seen zooming into Saint-Germain-en-Laye railway station, track 2. --Remontees 23:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed

January 10, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Statue of Ferdinando I de' Medici. Pisa, Italy --Super nabla 22:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Statue of Garibaldi. Pisa, Italy --Super nabla 22:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Statue of Garibaldi. Pisa, Italy --Super nabla 22:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A Grumman F11F Tiger which was used by the Blue Angels displayed at NAS Oceana's Aviation Historical Park. --Greyzxq 21:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    A few things with this mobile shot, first  Level of detail too low and also a bit overexposed on the top right, also the overall shot doesn't have enough definition for me. --多多123 22:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Veiled Vestal by Raffaelle Monti on display at Chatsworth House in Derbyshire, England. --Greyzxq 21:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is a very interesting spot; however, the image is tilted and the framing isn't the best either. --多多123 22:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Port and Hornos de cal at El Cotillo --Mike Peel 20:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hornos de cal at El Cotillo --Mike Peel 20:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hornos de cal at El Cotillo --Mike Peel 20:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mobile Toilet Wölkchen ist Liebe 1m² Wellness-Oase --C.Suthorn 20:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Requires proper categorising, otherwise good quality. --多多123 22:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done I replaced the redlink category by something more appropriate. I am not sure whether the catchy commercial advertising phrase both in the title and in the description is according to Commons rules (see e.g. Template:No advertising), but I certainly won't change anything about it. If it were my photograph, I might just call this a pink portable toilet in Berlin, Germany, which is less catchy, but more understandable and not just the commercial advertising phrase, which is visible on the toilet anyway. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
    Renamed. --C.Suthorn 08:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mural Landesinnung des Gebäudereiniger --C.Suthorn 20:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
    Any chance to reduce the chroma noise? --Plozessor 05:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Eftemie Emanuel and Popescu C. Maria Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
    A bit tilted in CCW direction too. --多多123 22:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the George Assan and Petre Petrini Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the George Assan and Petre Petrini Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
    A bit tilted in CCW direction. --多多123 22:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the George Assan and Petre Petrini Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: BMW Kidney grille on a BMW 2 Series Active Tourer --MB-one 19:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    I think photo needs a little bit more space from the sides. --Kurmanbek 18:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done new crop --MB-one 20:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Power lines in Valparaíso --Draceane 19:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pěčnov, view of Libín --Draceane 19:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 1962 Ford Thunderbird - white rear-left --多多123 17:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 1987 Cadillac Brougham - red lights --多多123 17:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 1987 Cadillac Brougham - red front --多多123 17:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Trekking trail of the Netravati peak --IM3847 14:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Clouds at the edge of Netravati peak --IM3847 14:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Clouds at the edge of Netravati peak from the summit of the mountain --IM3847 14:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Guadalest, Alicante, Spain --Poco a poco 09:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Guadalest Reservoir, Alicante, Spain --Poco a poco 09:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A carrion crow (Corvus corone) in parc Georges-Valbon, France. --Alexis Lours 08:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This has CA and some noise. --Plozessor 12:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view over Commune 13, San Javier, Medellín, Colombia. --Carschten 08:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, impressive view. --Aristeas 09:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Awards of the Volgograd Shipyard --Mike1979 Russia 06:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Armored boat BK-13 project 1125 on the embankment. --Mike1979 Russia 06:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Check the perspective, please. The street light is leaning to the right IMO. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
    Fixed --Mike1979 Russia 17:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. --Draceane 20:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Madan Mohan Temple at Sarkarpara area of Sarisha village in South 24 Pargana district. By User:Amitabha Gupta --Bodhisattwa 02:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Madan Mohan Temple at Sarkarpara area of Sarisha village in South 24 Pargana district. By User:Amitabha Gupta --Bodhisattwa 02:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Would be good if you fix the rotation and perspective. --Plozessor 05:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ruins of a mausoleum in Burana Tower site, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 00:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed

January 9, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Chromatic aberration. By User:Celeda --Yann 19:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    A wonderful image. But this is very special, so I would welcome an explanation how this image has been created. Is it a photography or rather computer-generated? --Aristeas 08:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Geological mapping in Onkalo spent nuclear fuel repository. --Kallerna 19:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Towers and houses in Lagia, Mani. --C messier 18:44, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen ID.3 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Al. Chirițescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Al. Chirițescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of the Al. Chirițescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Wiki Loves Bangla banner. Moheen 17:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)‎
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cinéma MEGARAMA of Saint-Étienne. --Touam 10:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please fix the verticals and the CAs. --XRay 14:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Panoramic view over Commune 13, San Javier, in the direction of the Robledo district in Medellín, Colombia. --Carschten 09:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Forestal road, Carvánka, Brdy Mountains --Draceane 08:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: El Puntero, Tenerife --Mike Peel 08:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View of the Place Barthélemy Dorez, in Lille, France --Velvet 08:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Flora and puttos group in the water parterre at Linderhof Palace in Bavaria. --Cayambe 07:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    It's tilted and the background is too noisy --Poco a poco 08:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: At La Palma 2020. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Chancel with Christmas decorations, St. Joseph's Cathedral, Allahabad, UP, India --Tagooty 00:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unfortunately not sharp enough. --C messier 20:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 8, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Statue of Lázaro Cárdenas (Puerto Vallarta) --Another Believer 05:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Space Needle, Seattle --Another Believer 05:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Calvary Cemetery (Seattle) --Another Believer 05:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Fisherman's Restaurant and Bar, Seattle --Another Believer 05:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cibali (tram station), Istanbul --Another Believer 05:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus) composite --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave of the Keutmann family in Krefeld-Bockum --Carschten 09:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Palace of La Cotilla, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 08:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review The building looks a bit unnaturally distorted. -- Spurzem 16:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
     New version --Poco a poco 20:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aircraft trolley with mounted bassinet by Egret at World Travel Catering & Onboard Services Expo 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 06:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO, it needs perspective correction. --C messier 20:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: PTS-M on Saaler Bodden during Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018 --MB-one 06:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit tilted ccw. --C messier 20:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lancair 360 at Mainz Finten Airfield --MB-one 06:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Please remove a dustspot in the lower sky at left. Otherwise good.
    Can you please makr the dustspot? I cant seem to find it. Or are you referring to the bird flying in the background? --MB-one 13:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from plank path to Lammassari in Viikin-Vanhankaupunginlahti nature reserve --Plozessor 05:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too big part is blown out + color banding on the sky --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 7, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Roe deer on the fields near Wszechświęte, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, Poland --Jakubhal 19:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Replica of Adormirea Maicii Domnului (Dormition of the Mother of God), after Dimitrie Paciurea, on the Grave of Atanasie Stolojan in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Atanasie Stolojan in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
    It's too soft and blurry. It would be nice to crop out the shadow of the photographer. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Park of Linderhof Palace in Bavaria, Germany. --Cayambe 15:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    A bit overexposed --MB-one 16:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Done You are right. Better now? --Cayambe 18:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris - Décoration XVIIe BnF Richelieu (mur de Cotte) (by Remi Mathis) --Sebring12Hrs 14:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 15:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New Year's Dawn - People on Vanjangi Hilltop Welcoming Sunrise on January 1st --IM3847 10:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 15:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Seaside Harvest - Fishermen Hauling Nets at Yarada Beach, Visakhapatnam --IM3847 10:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline Too soft, misfocused. --Kadellar 15:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vanjangi Vista - Panoramic Serenity Amidst Fog-Kissed Hills --IM3847 10:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Clouds in the left are blown out, right part is focused on the boulder (FG) and not on the hill. Overall it lacks of sharpness. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Field mouse-ear (Cerastium arvense) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support The central flower is outside of the focus a bit, but otherwise it's nice. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hagenbach tower in Vieux-Brisach (Allemagne). --Gzen92 10:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Big Duck, Long Island --Mike Peel 10:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trail closed sign at the Mill Creek Canyon Earthworks, a public park in Kent, Washington. --Roc0ast3r 09:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion I don't like the artificial phone bokeh, but QI. --Kadellar 15:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Double Ring Pond at the Mill Creek Canyon Earthworks, a public park in Kent, Washington. --Roc0ast3r 09:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Church of los Remedios, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 09:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO, you need to fix also the horizontal lines. --C messier 20:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 21:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museum of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 09:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bockum bathing center in Krefeld --Carschten 08:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ArtScience Museum, Marina Bay Sands, at night --Bijay Chaurasia 08:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 18:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination What ticket? Ticket machines at Bremen main station --JoachimKohler-HB 05:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 15:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 18th century frieze with the 14 Holy Helpers in Michelau --Plozessor 05:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Is it possible to get a rectilinear projection? --C messier 20:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apatlaco Waterfall, Puebla, Mexico --Cvmontuy 04:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
    This seems rotated. Needs to be aligned, and perspective should be at least improved. --Plozessor 05:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done --Plozessor 08:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 6, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: At Tenerife. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 22:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    For this static subject, the DoF is insufficient -- the rim of the hat and the top edge are blurry. The file name and description should be more descriptive. --Tagooty 02:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Tagooty: Thanks for looking, sharpened, renamed, and more description added, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 11:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
    The original image is 11.3 MB, after CA it has come down to 6.8 MB. I wonder if you have saved with <100% quality? This could cause the lower detail. --Tagooty 08:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Tagooty: It was saved with 90% quality, the same as all of my images. I denoise at the same time as I sharpen, which should explain this. Thanks. Mike Peel 22:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
    The blurry edges of the hat are a deal breaker for me. Could try adjusting denoising so it does not affect edges? And save at 100%. --Tagooty 03:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
    I've tweaked it some more as requested, have a look and see what you think? Thanks. --Mike Peel 20:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: eGo Life in Berlin --MB-one 21:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Contrast needs to be significantly improved, also perspective and noise corrections, fixable? --Mike Peel 23:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done better? --MB-one 20:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
    Nothing seems to have changed? --Mike Peel 22:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mobilitätszentrale Vorpommern in Greifswald --MB-one 21:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Can you reduce the noise? --Mike Peel 23:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done denoised --MB-one 20:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Much better, thanks. --Mike Peel 22:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Southern part of lake Untreu seen from a bridge, black-white. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Beautiful, but I would suggest to try to get the midtones a bit brighter. Right now it looks a bit gloomy, making the midtones brighter would IMHO improve the overall impression. --Aristeas 08:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done Thanks, I did adjust it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 11:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Maisonette on the quay of the Sinn in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 15:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good image but potentially a FoP problem. --MB-one 16:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: San Carlo al Corso in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Is rotation necessary ? --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
    It is an easy fix, you can ask a bot to do it. --C messier 00:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: In the forest near Königsberg --Ermell 09:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    More precise description needed. DoF seems low for this scene. --Tagooty 03:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
    What do you suggest? --Ermell 22:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 5, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 18:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Would be a great picture if it wouldn't have various ghosts due to long exposure. --Plozessor 05:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
    I don't find the ghosts distracting, but there is some chroma noise in the shadows. --C messier 13:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

January 4, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Seattle Japanese Garden --Another Believer 14:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment This seems tilted. Yann 12:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Butter beer. --Rjcastillo 01:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    quite noisy. --C messier 21:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for reviews. --Rjcastillo 17:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
    There is still noise in the darkest parts of the drinks. --C messier 21:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 3, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Photographs thrown into a street. --Touam 21:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    It seems quite questionable context for private photos per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. --Thi 22:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please fix the verticals. --XRay 12:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
    Fixed verticals. Unfortunately, the fence doesn't have perfectly straight verticals, so this is how they look in reality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
    IMO the building in the background is still leaning out. --XRay 15:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please fix the verticals. --XRay 12:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Coronilla_valentina_RF.jpg

• Nomination Scorpion vetch (Coronilla valentina) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose low JPEG compression --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for the reviews and the votes, but I cannot understand this one. Did you find disturbing JPEG artifacts (I can't) or do you feel that the file size is too big or too small (which should be irrelevant)? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment For me this picture is ok, but indeed it seems to have high JPG compression applied, resulting in a rather low level of detail in the yellow flowers. Might be better to save it in higher JPG quality. --Plozessor 19:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done Less JPEG compression and slightly wider crop. Is this better? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. --Draceane 08:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, better! --Plozessor 08:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Marina_Bay_Singapore-070A3500-HDR.jpg

• Nomination Marina Bay Singapore --Bijay Chaurasia 08:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 18:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  IMHO, it needs perspective correction, both sides are leaning in. --C messier 20:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per C messier, buildings are leaning a lot. --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Need perspective correction, but also it looks somehow overprocessed. Yes, it was a HDR shot with long exposure, but it looks like too much NR combined with too much sharpening or something like that. --Plozessor 08:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose In itself a nice composition with pleasant colours. I can accept the partial overexposure in the lights. I don't dare to judge whether the reflections in the water are realistic or fake. They certainly look nice. A perspective correction would probably not lead to absurd proportions and would therefore be useful and recommendable. But what really bothers me is the strange inconsistency in the detail: you can see clear noise right next to completely noise-free areas, crisp advertising neon signs next to completely blurred windows, other façade areas show massive sharpening artefacts and/or double contours. Overprocessed. --Smial 13:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

File:Risstal_03_–_Richtung_Almdorf_Eng.jpg

• Nomination Rißtal (valley of the river Riss) in Tyrol, Austria. --Cayambe 09:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blue hue doesn't look natural. --Draceane 10:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• weak Oppose Indeed the sky is a bit purple, should be easy to fix in raw conversion. --Plozessor 05:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Removing my vote as I have retouched the file. --Plozessor 11:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Done Blue hue reduced. Better now?--Cayambe 19:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Cayambe: Unfortunately not, now it's really bad. You somehow reduced the saturation of the mountains and sky, but also of a part of the trees. Now the trees below the mountain are green at the bottom and grey at the top. You should take the original version and change purple to blue. In Photoshop you'd do that with selective color adjustment, select purple tones and adjust the tone to be more blue and less purple. --Plozessor 19:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Plozessor. The 'selective color adjustment' works best for the RAW file, which inadvertently I had deleted and is lost now. I was not successful in performing the purple-blue toning correction in the tiff-version in PS. Best regards,--Cayambe 11:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

@Cayambe: @Draceane: Gave it a try myself, what do you think? --Plozessor 11:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment Why and in which cases should "selective colour adjustment" actually be necessary for landscape photos? (Serious question. With this photo here, it seems to have gone thoroughly wrong, in every version.) --Smial 13:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

@Smial: I guess something went wrong in raw conversion. In any case, in the original picture, all colors looked fine except for shades of blue, those appeared slightly purple. Adjusting brightness and hue for shades of blue improved the appearance. Of course it would have been better to adjust colors during raw conversion, but unfortunately the author does not have the raw file anymore. --Plozessor 14:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

@Smial: @Plozessor: It still appears a bit strange, we're not used to see neither colors in the reality. It's a pity, the capture is really nice, but I cannot get over the bluish hues. --Draceane 20:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Volgograd_Sudoverf_Railway_Station_2023-07-16_6467.jpg

• Nomination Sudoverf railway station --Mike1979 Russia 07:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose sky looks off --Bijay Chaurasia 17:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

What problem with the sky? --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

The sky is purple. Probably fixable though --MB-one 13:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Reset to "/Decline" because of the opposing vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• Tryed to fix the color of the sky. --Mike1979 Russia 08:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Sending this to CR to end the reversions to "/Nomination" and because the author edited the image. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good now. --Plozessor 05:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 10:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support good now --MB-one 18:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good to go. --Aristeas 09:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Paris_Air_Show_2019,_Le_Bourget_(SIAE8896).jpg

• Nomination Pilatus PC-21 on static display at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 14:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Sky is blown, and perspective needs correcting, maybe fixable? --Mike Peel 19:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Doesn't seem fixable, clouds seem OK to me when focusing on the plane. --多多123 22:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Moving this to discuss, I think the perspective at least needs fixing. --Mike Peel 20:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The clouds are overexposed. Tournasol7 05:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Clouds are ok (you can't demand full details in the brightest parts of clouds when the image focuses on an object on the ground). I can't see any issue with verticals (the buildings and tents in the background are perfectly aligned; the mobile fence might stand crooked. --Plozessor 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Clouds are indeed overexposed. Yann 23:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Burnt clouds, cluttered surroundings. --Smial 09:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

File:St_Mary_cathedral_in_Vitoria-Gasteiz_(5).jpg

• Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Mary cathedral in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
  This seems to have an unnatural blue tint; also the distortion is annoying, should probably compress at least the upper part a bit. --Plozessor 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  The blue tint is natural for this time of day (blue hour) and there is no distortion for me here. --Tournasol7 13:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry, the blue tint is minor and can be tolerated, but the distortion in the upper part is IMO unacceptable. The upper part of the tower is too much stretched vertically due to the way you applied perspective correction. Gradual compression (most on the top and none at the bottom) would fix this. I'd like to hear other's opinions, so would appreciate if you'd move it to discussion. --Plozessor 15:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  Sorry, but I disagree, discuss please. Tournasol7 19:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose. The tower is too distorted. -- Spurzem 10:09, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I consider the perspective correction to be geometrically correct. I also think that, as is so often the case with wide-angle photographs that have also been digitally corrected, it looks exaggerated and unnatural. However, we have a problem with "double standards", because in recent years countless similarly strongly verticalised images have not only been tolerated, but actually demanded by many here on QIC. The question arises as to whether forcibly verticalised photographs can become QI at all if they appear all too unnatural. And: Where do you draw the line between what is acceptable and what is not? --Smial 09:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
• Weak  Support, because this picture is borderline, but in the past many even worse verticalised photos have been praised. Colours are fine. --Smial 09:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Hamburg_Blumensand_Silo_Kruse.jpg

• Nomination Hamburg-Wilhelmsburg, Blumensand, Silo P. Kruse --KaiBorgeest 23:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too soft, maybe too strong jpg compression. Blown out sky. Slightly tilted. --Kadellar 13:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

File:ADAC,_IAA_Summit_2023,_Munich_(P1120209).jpg

• Nomination Polestar 3 on display at ADAC booth, IAA Summit 2023 in Munich --MB-one 19:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Sorry, this would be a great photo but that half head really kills it IMHO. --Plozessor 05:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
   Support I don't think so, I didn't even see it when I examined the image yesterday, so I vote to promote. --多多123 17:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
   Comment The man has gone now. His half head over the roof of the car was very disturbing indeed. -- Spurzem 17:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  @Spurzem: Yeah, but the traces of your edits can be seen - there is a rectangle with a slightly different color than then surroundings, and part of the car's roof is missing. Thus still no QI for me, sorry. --Plozessor 17:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment @Plozessor: Of course we can criticize at the highest level. But what errors you see are probably more of a guess than reality because you know what it looked like before.  Support For me the picture is good now. -- Spurzem 10:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment @Spurzem: Let me quote you: Why am I biased when I see clear defects in a photo? Can pictures only be praised here? Here's an overcontrasted excerpt of the new version, that shows the defects I'm referring to: Click. The original version had an annoying head in the background but no technical defect. Your edit has technical defects from incorrect retouching. Would be great if correctly retouched though. --Plozessor 11:09, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

@Plozessor: It is astonishing how you believe to have discovered a serious error in the execution of what you consider to be a completely unsuccessful retouching, but on the other hand, you recently rated a partially blue-tinged photo of an altar as a quality image. Our ideas about good images are obviously very different. -- Spurzem 12:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

@Spurzem: We might have different ideas or probably different monitors or different eyes, that's what the CR process is for. --Plozessor 13:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Question Is it appropriate that User:Spurzem voted for a photo version that he retouched? Or should this vote be removed? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

@Robert Flogaus-Faust: Please tell me the law that prohibits collegiality. -- Spurzem 22:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment I just gave you an answer on my German Wikipedia talk page. Briefly, you uploaded a version of the photo that you retouched and then voted for this retouched version. In my opinion, retouching a photo makes you a coauthor of the retouched version and you should not be allowed to vote for it, just like the original author. But please correct me if I am wrong. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Robert Flogaus-Faust Fixed the retouching issue myself now, and suggest that you cancel both Spurzem's and my vote. --Plozessor 12:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Done. Is this an acceptable compromise for User:Spurzem? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Plozessor: Can you please tell me where my supposedly serious error in image editing was, which you have now corrected in a masterly manner? It would also be interesting to know what gives you the right to delete my review, even though I basically don't care anymore. -- Spurzem 14:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Spurzem: See the link I already posted yesterday:
  https://i.ibb.co/HpKdyMY/cardetail.jpg
  You covered the head with a square that had a slightly different tone than the surroundings, resulting in sharp edges ('your' rectangle was visible). Depending on the monitor settings, one might not see the difference; on my monitor it was really annoying. --Plozessor 14:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Cluttered surroundings. And because the sharpening artefacts present in the original were not taken into account, the car now also has a dent in the roof. --Smial 09:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

@Smial: I also saw the apparent dent; but it is probably part of the body shape. Best regards -- Spurzem 12:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

@Smial: On Spurzem's side here; the original picture shows quite clearly that the dent is real, it's not a photographic/retouching flaw. Surroundings are not optimal, but they hardly are for these car pictures; at least there are no people right behind the car (anymore). --Plozessor 13:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment Well, the retouching can still be seen, especially since you have also removed the noise that is present in the surroundings and left a hard edge. One can think it's great, but in view of the overall impression of this photo, I take the liberty of sticking to my opposing vote. --Smial 17:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Centro_de_interpretación_románico,_Luesia,_Zaragoza,_España,_2023-01-04,_DD_63.jpg

• Nomination Reredos of St Fabian and Sebastian, Romanesque interpretation centre, Luesia, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 07:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the crucifixion scene at the top and the top panel on the right are too bright and the colors are therefore unnatural. I know from experience how difficult it is sometimes to photograph such painting, but in my opinion difficulties are not a criterion for a quality image. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
•  New version --Poco a poco 20:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support O.K. for me.--Ermell 22:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support good rework. --Smial 15:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I can't imagine that the colors of the middle panel above and the top panel on the right are anywhere close to reality. But maybe it's because of my eyes that I can't share the general enthusiasm for the photo. -- Spurzem 18:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment @Poco a poco: @Spurzem: Indeed this seems to have a bit more yellow in reality; there's a professional picture here. --Plozessor 13:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment @Poco a poco: @Spurzem: @Plozessor: In your example, the tablecloth on the altar has a visible yellow tint. Normally they are pure white. With mixed lighting, you often have to decide in favour of one variant. In the professional picture, the decision was apparently made to reduce the blue cast in the areas with daylight. This makes everything else slightly yellowish. Poco has decided to achieve a colour balance that is as neutral as possible. This is definitely not a quality defect. --Smial 08:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Smial: That's why I support this photo, see my comment to Spurzem below. --Plozessor (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. Thanks to Smial for his comment on the white balance and the comparison of the photos! --Aristeas 10:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

@Smial: I do not think like you. The lower part of the retable shows colors similar to those that can be seen in reality under artificial light. The upper part, especially the crucifixion scene, has an unsightly blue cast. -- Spurzem 13:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment I think we don't have clear guidelines for "correct" colors under non-white light. Had one picture of a wayside shrine that looks yellow in reality because it's in a dark niche and most of the light that reaches it is reflected by the yellow walls, but that was not accepted as a QI. Only when I changed the white balance, so that the picture showed the object as it would appear under white light, it was accepted. We might have a similar case here - should the picture resemble the yellowish light in the church, or should it show the object as it would look under white light? --Plozessor 13:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

 Comment The pictures in the virtual tour linked by Plozessor have exactly the same problems in several different views, only, as already mentioned, the professional photographers there have opted for a more yellowish colour balance, which is just "wrong" in a different way. There, too, parts that receive light from the windows are slightly bluish in colour compared to the rest. That's just the way it is with mixed light. --Smial 17:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

I think we all know how difficult it can be to photograph paintings and to reproduce the colors evenly. But can I say a picture is good or even excellent if this consistent reproduction is not achieved? -- Spurzem 19:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Who exactly forbade you from doing that? --Smial 20:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Tue 09 Jan → Wed 17 Jan
• Wed 10 Jan → Thu 18 Jan
• Thu 11 Jan → Fri 19 Jan
• Fri 12 Jan → Sat 20 Jan
• Sat 13 Jan → Sun 21 Jan
• Sun 14 Jan → Mon 22 Jan
• Mon 15 Jan → Tue 23 Jan
• Tue 16 Jan → Wed 24 Jan
• Wed 17 Jan → Thu 25 Jan